Renaissance Trophy Wife

modern lifestyle investments for women who want it all

Archive for the ‘Trust fund, baby!’ Category

Finance & investment

And the madness begins

Posted by RenaissanceTrophyWife on January 21, 2010

So now that we’re planning our wedding (gulp), I’m trying not to get totally overwhelmed with all the blogs and magazines and sources of inspiration out there.  BUT, I saw these on ideeli and couldn’t help thinking of a certain event.

I love these simple but elegant options for a rehearsal dinner dress:

And these would look fab on my bridesmaids.  I kinda want one for myself, and they’d be super rewearable, too.  I don’t think it comes out on the far right dress, but there are sweet rosettes on the front.  So pretty!

That’s not the best part– they’re all <$70!  No, I didn’t leave off a zero. And there are dozens of other cute cocktail dresses to boot.

What do you think?  Which one would you prefer to wear as a bridesmaid?  I might just bite the bullet…

Click here for an invitation to the site.

(All photos courtesy of ideeli.)

Posted in Trust fund, baby!, Who's Your Stylist? | Tagged: , , | 2 Comments »

The End: Getting to “Rich” (Part I)

Posted by RenaissanceTrophyWife on May 25, 2009

This post is part of a miniseries on my quarterlife (re)invention process.  I left off discussing my strategy of beginning at the end, and the next few posts will provide more detail on the various goals I’m working towards.  If you’re evaluating your life in a similar manner, maybe some of this will strike a chord… and if you’ve got things figured out, please feel free to chime in with advice!  Without further ado:

My first goal is to be rich.

Not rich in the sense of Warren Buffett/Donald Trump– although that would be nice– but rich in the context of my own life.  Frankly I consider it “being comfortable” rather than “being rich,”  but I also realize that I am already incredibly wealthy in comparison to individuals in developing nations, and I might as well recognize that the ideals I strive for encompass far more than the basic necessities.  Why is this the first goal I’ve chosen?  It’s not more important than health or happiness, but the metrics are much easier to track.  Also, all three are intertwined, and I have to start somewhere.

Lack of money can create stress, force uncomfortable decisions, and generally introduce quite a bit of uncertainty into life.  While more money does not necessarily make you happier beyond a certain point, having enough money for the basics may allow you to escape some stressors and generally lead a more fulfilling life.

Early on (say about 8th grade?), I realized that in order to feel secure, I needed to achieve a level of earning power that would not limit my options– to learn, to travel, to make a positive impact in my community.  That’s a vague goal, to be sure, but it’s one that works for me personally.  Money is only as good as what you spend it on, and although it’s backwards in a way, I’ll start with a focus on the spending part and follow up with dollar estimates in a later post.

Money and Family

Today, many families are forced to choose between an education for their children, or nursing care for aging parents. As early as high school, my female peers started talking about  marrying rich, instead of marrying for love.  Maybe I was more idealistic than most at that age, but hearing such sentiments just rubbed me the wrong way.   I’ve also witnessed firsthand the devastation of families when the primary wage-earner has a catastrophic accident, and can no longer work– in the worst cases, social services gets involved, children are placed in foster care, and both parents spiral into depression.  (I’m not referring to my own family, thank goodness, but to patients I’d cared for throughout my clinical years.)

I’m not afraid to admit that I’m scared of having to make such a decision.  I don’t believe that Social Security or Medicare will actually provide any benefit to my parents’ generation, let alone my own.  And you know what?  I may be overly cautious, but confronting that fear and taking steps to prevent it go a long way toward my psychological security.

I felt that I would be ready for a family only when I could provide for all of us on my salary alone.  Maybe this is more of a masculine perspective, but that begs the question, why should it be? The females of most species tend to be the nurturing, caring ones, seeing to the needs of family members.  Why, in a money-based economy, should that responsibility not extend to financial nurturing and caring?

Money and Love

For all my pragmatism, I’m also an unabashed romantic.  Even before I wanted to settle down in a serious relationship, I kept thinking, “What if my perfect man is an penniless artist/writer/musician?”  If push came to shove, and I had to make a choice between an amazing partner who couldn’t support himself, and someone ok who was more responsible, I’m not really sure I could find an effective compromise.  My financial goals were designed to avoid that crossroads, and luckily I found the perfect partner who is creative AND responsible.  He also happens to be financially savvy and either one of us could support a family on our salary alone.

Now that I’ve achieved a level of earnings that allow me to save significantly for retirement as well as healthcare costs, I feel a lot more comfortable.  Current goals include continuing to save towards retirement while increasing my nest egg for a down payment, and educational costs for our future children.

Money and Career

If I won the lottery tomorrow, I know exactly what I’d do with the money– I’d quit my current job but definitely wouldn’t stop working.  My work/life balance is quite enjoyable, and my personality is well-suited by having projects to keep my mind engaged.

While my job is currently a way for me to learn valuable transferable skills while furthering my financial goals, I want to get to a point where I can do good AND do well.  The golden handcuffs are ok for now, but by starting up my new social venture in parallel, I hope to transition sooner rather than later– ideally in the next several years.

Rich isn’t a number, it’s a state of mind.  I’m quite happy with my current situation, but as my environment changes, I must continue to adjust in order to maintain that level of contentment and security. Maybe you can’t buy happiness, but you can definitely earn it.

What does “rich” mean to you?

Image sources: 1, 2, 3

Posted in Career Chick, Carpe Diem, The RTW Tao, Trust fund, baby!, Venus & Mars | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments »

Finance Lessons from the Oracle of Omaha

Posted by RenaissanceTrophyWife on May 4, 2009

Berkshire Hathaway’s recent annual meeting provided a great opportunity for Warren Buffett to reiterate some of the same advice he’s been providing for the last several decades.  Given the current economic climate, it seems that people are more willing to listen, but even then the news is cautionary at best.

That bad, huh?

Buffett’s strategy is to keep it simple.  He goes for companies with great fundamentals, and invests for the long term.  Granted, Buffett did acquire preferred shares of Goldman Sachs and GE, but at terms the rest of us can only dream about– 10% dividends are pretty attractive.

What about his perspective on riskier ventures?  “A line from a country song expresses our feeling about new ventures, turnarounds, or auction-like sales: ‘When the phone don’t ring, you’ll know it’s me.’”

It’s not as if he thinks he’s exempt– predictions for the growth of BRK aren’t rosy.  According to Dealbook, “Mr. Buffett said that he envisioned growth that was a couple of points or so above the Standard & Poor’s 500 index. He acknowledged that the much faster growth of the firm’s early days wasn’t likely to return.”  (For reference, book value per share has historically grown at over 20% annually.)

We could all take a cue…  the market’s unlikely to rebound as quickly as the media predicts– and even then, growth prospects are significantly diminished.  This is not to say one shouldn’t invest, but if you don’t understand what you’re investing in, maybe you should think harder about parting with your hard-earned cash.

If the Oracle of Omaha can state his six acquisition criteria in plain language that any layperson could understand, it’s worth forcing your financial advisor (if you even use one) to explain your investments similarly.  Better yet, fire them and do your own diligence.  If Buffett admits that he won’t invest without understanding the technology, do you really think it makes sense for others to do so?

*ACQUISITION CRITERIA*

We are eager to hear from principals or their representatives about
businesses that meet all of the following criteria:

(1) Large purchases (at least $75 million of pretax earnings unless the
business will fit into one of our existing units),

(2) Demonstrated consistent earning power (future projections are of no
interest to us, nor are “turnaround” situations),

(3) Businesses earning good returns on equity while employing little or no
debt,

(4) Management in place (we can’t supply it),

(5) Simple businesses (if there’s lots of technology, we won’t understand
it)
,

(6) An offering price (we don’t want to waste our time or that of the seller
by talking, even preliminarily, about a transaction when price is unknown).

And to sum it up?

“Success in investing doesn’t correlate with I.Q. once you’re above the level of 125. Once you have ordinary intelligence, what you need is the temperament to control the urges that get other people into trouble in investing.” (BusinessWeek interview, June 25 1999)

Still true a decade later…  they don’t call him the Oracle for nothing.

What’s your favorite piece of investment advice?


Posted in Career Chick, Trust fund, baby! | Tagged: , , , , , , | 4 Comments »

Buying My Next Car: The Mommymobile

Posted by RenaissanceTrophyWife on April 6, 2009

Imagine what would happen if a Maserati and an Aston Martin had babies…  babies that were electric!

They’d probably look something like this:

Images from Tesla Motors.

Drool.  How gorgeous is that?   Production’s slated for 2011, at which point my current car will be 12 years old…  I feel like that warrants an upgrade.

The price tag’s a little steep at close to $60k (not including tax credits that may or may not exist when the car actually becomes available).  However,  it’s targeted at the luxury market, and equipped as such.  0-60 in under 6 seconds?  Yes please!  100% torque, all the time?  Bring it on!!!  Suddenly the price tag sounds more reasonable.  This is not your grandmother’s Prius, girl.

I love the sleek styling, and hey, it fits 5 adults + 2 kids, with a range of 160-300 miles per charge, so that’s definitely functional.  The rear hatch opens up to allow transportation of a 50″ flatscreen TV, a surfboard, or a mountain bike (front wheel still attached) in the cargo area.  All in all, much more practical than the $100k Roadster which resembles the Lotus Elise.  (For more specs and pretty pictures, check out Wired’s coverage of the Model S unveiling.)

Obviously, buying a car is a very personal choice– some people are all about the form, some are all about the function, and some want the best of both worlds.

Why is this the vehicle I’ve targeted?

1. I want my next vehicle to be an electric or hybrid car.

Given that I am in a financial position to pay a slight premium for an environmentally friendly vehicle, I am willing to do so.  Yes, when I was a poor student I tried to squeeze every last penny of value out of every purchase, and I’m still very conscious of where I spend my money.  While being good to the planet is not necessarily going to result in any tangible return to myself specifically, I’m ok with paying extra for it so that the air is a little bit cleaner for us all.

2.  I plan on driving my next car for approximately 10 years as well.

This might sound ridiculous to many people, but it’s what works best for my lifestyle.  By planning my purchases carefully, I don’t feel the need to upgrade every few years.  I bought my car used, and paid it off 4-5  years ago.  My cost of ownership is now only routine maintenance, plus gas and insurance!  I love my (old) car and am also happy with the amount I’ve saved.

Note:  if you also have a decade-old car and are thinking about buying a new one, check the status of trade-in incentive legislation– you could save yourself quite a bit of time and money.

A guest post over at Get Rich Slowly and Liz Pulliam Weston at MSN Money both make the case for driving your car for the longest time possible.  For an interactive version, check out Dave Ramsey’s slideshow here.

3.  I want something practical.

This is a corollary to 2, since I’ll likely have kids within the next decade.  My version of practical means 4 doors and plenty of storage, ability to handle well in various  conditions, along with a fairly reliable reputation.  As I live in CA, I don’t have to think too much about snow unless I want to go to Tahoe, and this sedan seems like it’ll fit the bill.  The battery is supposed to last approximately 10 years, and will likely be replaceable when new technology comes out.  Plus, without the requirement of oil changes, etc. the car only needs to be tuned up annually.  Talk about a timesaver!

4.  Style counts!

I’ve got eyes, too… and if you do the research the first time around, and really think about what works for you AND makes you happy, it’s a lot easier to stay happy with your initial pick.   This car may be my future mommymobile, but it’s definitely not going to give off that vibe to everyone I pass on the freeway. ;-)   There’s something to be said for unpredictability.

What do you consider when making large purchases?  Would the Model S fit your lifestyle, or not?  Suggestions for anything else I should consider?


Posted in Girly Geek, Trust fund, baby! | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments »

Thank You

Posted by RenaissanceTrophyWife on March 20, 2009

Ladies,

Thanks so much for the comments and support!  While my offer wasn’t accepted, I still feel pretty good about it.  And my piggy bank is still intact!

source

First of all, it turns out I was competing against 11 other offers (uh, aren’t we supposed to be in the middle of a recession?!?!).  Funnily enough, after I put in the offer I found out my BF’s parents’ neighbors were also bidding on it for their kids!

My offer (according to the agent) was definitely on the high end and was being considered seriously, which makes me more confident that my valuation perspectives are not totally out of whack.  Although in this market, you definitely have to take things on a case-by-case basis…

The house went to one bidder who put in an offer SUBSTANTIALLY more than everyone else at the 11th hour.  If the premium price is worth it to them, that’s great, and I don’t mind losing out at a price I’m not willing to pay.

In the end, I’m not out any money, I put in an offer that was fair and gave me a good shot at the property, and I also have the experience of going through that entire process.  Will post on the process prep next week, hopefully.

And now for some Friday goodness:

Why not get in some real entertainment during your surfing around today?  Head on over here to Amazon and sink your teeth into Kristan Hoffman’s excerpt from her Breakthrough Novel entry, The Good Daughters.  Don’t forget to review!  I just wish there was more available…

I’m also eagerly anticipating the release of The Longshot by Katie Kitamura, which was reviewed here.  The weather’s been getting better so I’m spending less time curled up with books inside, but I’m always a sucker for a good read.

Happy weekend, everyone!

Posted in Career Chick, Trust fund, baby! | Tagged: , , , | 3 Comments »